Sathya Sai Baba fundamental(ist) confusion about goodness
Posted by robertpriddy on September 15, 2011
“According to Moore, the mistake of thinking that goodness is some natural property of things,
such as their capacity to produce pleasure.” The Cambridge Encyclopedia
Sathya Sai Baba commits this fallacy of confusing ‘is’ and ‘ought’ or facts and values time and again. This is a throwback to the less sophisticated attitude in religiously-dominated society where values are actually treated as facts (for example, thinking that e. ‘Thou shalt not kill is a fact”). Because of this confused doctrine, Sathya Sai Baba is guilty of the fallacy of anthropomorphism, which is attributing a human personality or character traits to impersonal entities. In his views on nature it runs entirely wild.
Sai Baba applied mental, psychological or spiritual qualities of human being to animals and even objects. (note: trees that provide shade, exemplar crows, peaceable lions, devotional dogs, spiders, ‘weeping saris’ and much more – even Bhoomidev as Mother Earth (‘who’ reacts karmically against human sins with earthquakes, tsunamis, withholding rain, droughts etc.) Sathya Sai Baba’s cheapest aphorism is ‘Nature is the best teacher’. This has the ring of a bad ‘penny proverb and is typical of his deeply flawed imaginings about animals and nature.
See ´Tsunami anniversary – Sathya Sai Baba’s opinion on it
Nature as the best teacher – Sai as a bad one Simplistic ideas about human intelligence and the nature of animals.


Web vandalism by fanatics


