Sathya Sai Baba Deceptions Exposed

Exposing major deceits by guru Sathya Sai Baba in India, incl. murders cover-up & widely alleged sexual abuse

Archive for the ‘Internet Abuse’ Category

Gerald Moreno’s wildest attack so far?

Posted by robertpriddy on September 26, 2009

For several years, Moreno wrote a mass of untruths and attacks about dozens of those who left Sathya Sai Baba because of the sex revelations. His main target at first was Sanjay Dadlani about whom he wrote the most disgusting things, sexual allegations of all kinds – not least naming him a proved pervert – and made very disgusting pictures using Dadlani’s face on a naked overweight woman and as a pig etc. He put up many defamatory web pages and several blogs entries attacking Dadlani. The distorted images Moreno made can be seen here (Equalizer is none other than Gerald Moreno, as he eventually had to admit). including entering Dadlani’s name and false information on numerous pornography sites! (see this). That blog expressed tremendous frustrated rage, but since Dadlani has withdrawn into his professional work and so he has another top target, guess who.

Increasingly he has directed his worst efforts against the two most important critics of Sai Baba, Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard. Moreno’s writings against Robert Priddy are amazing in the degree of madcap hate and name-calling… and what I find are perversions of the facts at every turn [to get this, you have got to compare what Moreno writes with what Priddy actually writes on his own web pages and blogs]

Moreno has often accused me of ‘blathering’, ‘frothing at the mouth’ and many other such irrelevant actions. There is no evidence that I do any such thing, and I do not. However, what is Moreno doing here:-The transparent attempt to invalidate in advance any clarifications I might give speaks for itself how deeply Moreno tried to avoid any facts penetrating to himself or his clientele. However, in every case my wife was present at what are called ‘private interviews’ with Sai Baba, I was never alone with him anywhere for a second. His attempt to twist facts by false interpretation fell flat here as usual. It is bizarre in the extreme, since he implies that one may implicate Sai Baba as a sexual abuser (of me)!  Further, I was 50 years old at the first interview (1986), and it is reported widely that Sai Baba only likes young men… no person ever alleged sexual abuse when they were over 35 years of age.

As my entire output shows, I was never involved in anything remotely like the interview Moreno describes that he had so I am entirely free of the perceptions that Moreno in the intensity of his rigid denial insists I must have! Moreno’s wrote so guardedly about the oiling experience which I asked him to describe that he gives a tangible impression of embarrassment to tell just how Sai Baba reached his lower stomach with a handful of oil… or any other details.

He was definitely still confused about it all long, long after when he wrote that he believed Sai Baba to be a sexual abuser, “mingling the miraculous with the mundane” in some accounts. And, amusingly to most no doubt, he calls me “sexually twisted”, while he was defending on the www tooth and nail a person who he for years saw as a ‘partly miraculous’ sexual abuser!

Gerald Moreno wrote :-

“Referenced from: Greg Gerson says, “During one interview, which occurred just before I was scheduled to fly home to America, while we were alone, Sai Baba had me pull down my pants. He then “materialized” oil and pulled down my underwear and applied the oil on my lower abdomen below my navel and above my penis. He did not touch me sexually or ask me to do anything to him.” (see here)

Basava Premanand replied: It is only after the person reacts passively to the request of pulling down his pants that SSB himself pulls down the underwear when he wants physical contact with the genitals, then massaging below navel up to the penis and watching the facial changes then only SSB moves to next and further manipulations sexually. This genital area oiling is not mentioned in any of the medical or religious texts from India. Oiling is not done in one part of the body but all over the body and massaging every part in Ayurveda, The massaging is done not only by hands but also by legs. This is believed as a rejuvenating therapy.

The very fact that Greg Gerson allowed SSB to make him pull down his underwear only indicates how much faith he then had on SSB as god on earth. David Paul states:”I was taken into the back room and subjected to one of the so called oilings that have so often been spoken of and I am not sure even today where I stand on that particular subject” This clearly refutes GM’s claim that Paul also stated “that what happened to him was not sexual abuse”. Here he is again attempting to deceive through inaccurate and tendentious presentation of the documented facts.

I know from a former friend, Michael Oliver, that Moreno had the same admiration for Sai Baba and therefore no doubt had his pants taken down, one way or another! The cardinal fact – that Moreno wishes in vain to deny – is that Sathya Sai Baba used oil on Gerald Moreno’s lower stomach (which is ‘in the genital region’) and this is classified as sexual molestation when carried out by other than a registered doctor, which Sai Baba definitively is not. It makes no difference in law whether the subject of the act experienced it as pleasant or otherwise! The act of genital oiling is known to the pathology of sexual deviation as a form of “grooming’ for possible sexual intercourse. Whether the perpetrator proceeds or not usually depends on how well it is received.

Finally, another lie and blustering threats by Moreno to conclude:-

I have never made a single legal threat against Gerald Moreno as he well knows. He has never received a letter from my lawyers. I have occasionally made a general warning about infringement of my copyright. Since Moreno is raring to go to court, let him sue me. My legal advisors see not a single point in which I am in jeopardy. And note the fantasy in Moreno's anal threat above.

I have never made a single legal threat against Gerald Moreno as he well knows. He has never received a letter from my lawyers.I have occasionally made a general warning about infringement of my copyright. Since Moreno is raring to go to court, let him sue me. My legal advisers see not a single point in which I am in jeopardy. I do know, however, that lawyers have been contacted by other offended parties to examine the options concerning Moreno. Note the vulgar fantasy in Moreno's anal threat above!

Further relevant instance of cover-up of genital nature of oiling, later admitted:
That I suggested that Moreno may not be telling the whole story due to embarrassment is not at all far-fetched nor in the least ‘perverted’ on my part as he so wildly protests! If that were so, then every charge of sexual molestation presented by anyone in any court, by Moreno’s standard, would be ‘perverted’! One case which illumines this is that of the British-Canadian author Paul William Roberts, who was clearly too embarrassed about what happened to him in a Sai Baba private interview to describe it for what it was. Roberts described in his book how he was oiled when in his early twenties ”on the chest”. (See last page but one of ‘Empire of the Soul’ Chapter 3 (p. 37 in original Canadian edition, 1994. US edition 1996) which is paraphrased and also directly quoted here:

Interview. P.W.Roberts feels Sai Baba’s love. B. tells him all about his life and gives a breakdown of his personality. Then B. circles his hand and “a white oily substance” appears “in his palm”. “Somehow, I knew what he wanted to do, so I lifted my shirt and let him rub this substance into my chest. I kept thanking him profusely.” The next few days are spent in a daze of happiness and are a blur to PWR.

Subsequent to this published account, however, this confirmed devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, Paul William Roberts circulated an e-mail to a number of devotees telling them that this was actually a full scale genital oiling! He backed this up in another e-mail in July 2004, and confirmed having written it and that it can be circulated to other devotees. These e-mails can be produced as required by any court). A quotation from that e-mail follows:-
”My experience does in fact include genital contact. Baba materialized some kind of white ointment and rubbed in onto my perineum. It was done in a very maternal manner. He looked away while he was doing it and made no actual contact with my penis or scrotum. It was not remotely sexual and reminded me of a nurse performing a routine procedure.”

(Note: the ‘perineum’ is the sensitive area between the genitals and the anus!). Seeing that a widely-respected journalist and author like P.W. Roberts completely misrepresented the nature of the oiling by Sai Baba in his book and let this stand for many years uncorrected (as it remains today), yet later confirmed in his widely-circulated e-mail to devotees how he had in fact covered up the embarrassing fact, you may imagine how difficult many find telling the true state of affairs. As to Roberts’ subjective belief about his not having been subjected to any sexual act, it is of similar kind to Moreno’s in his writing of his ‘not having a clue’.

For further reference:- Genital Oiling by Sathya Sai Baba

Gerald Joe Moreno and genital oiling by Sai Baba

Former Sai-follower exposes sex abuse on US TV

Please go to the Public Petition for Official Investigations of Sathya (or Satya) Sai Baba and His Worldwide Organization


Posted in Character assassination, Cults, disinformation, Gurus, Internet Abuse | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Wikipedia harassment by pro-Sai Baba activists

Posted by robertpriddy on September 12, 2009

For the sake of setting the record straight concerning harassment on Wikipedia, I repost the following points from the Requests for Arbitration discussion. Note that user SSS108 is Gerald Joe Moreno, who still energetically radiates his attacks on all dissidents and critics of Sathya Sai Baba:-

Statement by M Alan Kazlev

I was a devotee of Sai Baba for more than two decades, and therefore was originally sympathetic to the arguments of SSS108, who contacted me when I had inadvertently been caught in the crossfire of the flamewar between certain followers and certain critics of SSB. Having assessed and corresponded at length with representatives of both sides (SS108 on the SSB side, and several ex-devotees regarding the side that is concerned about the allegations), as well as looking at what both sides had written, I came to the conclusion that the allegations made concerning Sai Baba are factual, but that Sai Baba is not simply a fake or con-artist. Rather he belongs to an ambiguous category in which both truth and falsehood are inextricably mixed (as explained on my website etc). I have observed that SSS108 uses tactics of slander, libel, and smear against ex-devotees in order to discredit their reports of sexual abuse by SSB. Again, this is explained on my website, with especial reference to Robert Priddy.

Once I was considered to be no longer a naive devotee of SSB, SS108 decided to try to attack me, and has a rather amusing blog dedicated to me. My only interest re the SSB page is that both sides of the argument should be presented, without bias, and there should not be censorship or bullying of any kind. This would allow the reader who is unfamiliar with this subject to come to their own conclusions. M Alan Kazlev 04:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)———

SSS108 continues to be aggressive, abusive[44], and confrontational. —Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I’ve now had to block him for harassment and incivility; his response was to make obscure and unfounded accusations against my being involved in a conflict of interest on an article that I’ve hardly touched. —Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Statement on Wikipedia by ProEdits  (Robert Priddy)

SSS108 has consistently used Wikipedia pages to attempt to defame me and attack me, my statements and biography in apparently any way he can devise (such as on the Robert Priddy talk page), constantly calling me ‘a liar’ see User_talk: and a blatant one also without any reliable independent evidence on Wikipedia or elsewhere. This is obvious to me, of course, because I have never lied in any of my writings, which means consciously to tell something one knows or firmly believes to be untrue. Neither SSS108 nor FreeLanceResearch (Lisa de Witt) can show that I have ‘lied’ or that I am ‘a liar’.  I have recently reaffirmed the opinion that Sai Baba is SSS108s guru, which he repeatedly writes is ‘a lie’. It is not a lie but a matter of definition, and the facts speak loud to favour my interpretation, that SSS108s apparent full-time defence throughout Wikipedia and the Internet of Sathya Sai, his organisation and almost anyone who is a devotee (for several years even while he admitted on his own website he believed him to be a sexual abuser!)

One example; on my talk page SSS108 has concocted a proposition that there was a “million dollar legal suit against Robert Priddy” [45] . No lawsuit has ever been filed against me, nor even have I received any such claim from anyone, neither from Rebello, let alone any lawyer. May I say in this connection that the same Rebello, who wears the title ‘Dr.’ has been reported by FreeLanceResearch as saying some years ago that I am dying of AIDS [46], though I have never had AIDS and nor has Rebello ever even seen me (COMMENT inserted today: some ‘doctor’ – merely a doctor of homeopathy! No doubt a fraudulent claimant to any medical degree). His claim of a million dollar lawsuit falls into the same category of statement! This is the kind of tactic SSS108 uses against me on a major scale (ADDITION today: claiming that I was threatened with a lawsuit, which I never was. It was the free web server he threatened, who decided it was not worth the battle, not surprisingly).

Further, SSS108 refers to matters external to Wikipedia in that he asserts on my talk page and elsewhere that I have had 6 websites deleted for defamation, but the webmasters or ISPs involved in my discontinued free website space have never informed that there was any defamation by me, or I would certainly have reacted. Moreover, there is no material I have posted against Sai Baba which is not still found on other of my websites, where I have gradually collected all other ‘stray materials’ from former web pages. SSS108 falsely claims (i.e without any public evidence) that a website ‘ ‘was mine, but it must have been made by someone else as I never made it (see Google). I can only think it was an attempt at further defamation of me by one of my most active critics, as also was the porn site entry of one of my URLs (as if I would pay to enter my own URL there! (See on Google), which SSS108 has publicised widely on the web with screen captures as part of his dirty tricks campaign.Because I truthfully and most successfully criticise Sathya Sai Baba on grounds that no one has been able to prove untrue in any detail and not therefore either defamatory or libellous.

SSS108 is wiki-stalking [47] various critics of Sathya Sai Baba. For example, SSS108 followed me to the ‘Arne Næss’ Wiki page [48], where – having taught some of Næss’ philosophy for many years – I made an entry which was admittedly original research. I was not then aware of the policy of Wikipedia on original research. SSS108 Wiki-stalked me to that page and deleted my contribution (but it was reinstated by another editor). SSS108 also stalked me by adding links to his [highly slanderous] web pages about me onto my personal Wiki page 1 (which he was virtually forced to remove when he learned from the active Wiki editor Alan Kazlev of Wiki policy on biographies of living persons). He continues to cause maximum disruption by arbitration requests etc.

SSS108 and FreeLanceResearch also therefore Wiki-stalked the prominent Wikipedia editor M. Alan Kazlev by adding their votes to help close down his personal Wiki page, which incidentally had nothing to do with Sathya Sai Baba, and SSS108 also posted a vituperative blog against him after he realised that SSS108 is a slanderer – see Statement by [49].

As further evidence [external but relevant as background, I assume, since Wiki arbitrators here also refer to external events on occasion] that SSS108s Wiki writings are an extension of his stalking agenda, SSS108 repeatedly attacked and stalked the Sai critic Barry Pittard, reporting contacts with Pittard’s former partner to dig for information against Pittard, and the results he posted as outright slander on his website and on Yahoo sathyasaibaba2 group [see

Extra note: The sathyasaibaba2 group was terminated by the moderator due to excessive abuse by de SWitt and Moreno etc. Lisa de Witt has copied and even exceeded her advisor, Joe108/SSS108 aka Moreno,  in calling me such, whether blatant, flagrant, shameless or the like (see some of her countless accusations here) and look at the language and real vileness of some few of Moreno’s disgusting allegations here. This Mr. Moreno is the webmaster of a blog pretending to stand for ‘Love, Life and Sopirituality’ where he posts under the name of ‘sathysaibaba’ no less…  A real Jekyll and Hyde at work!

Posted in Character assassination, Cults, Guru Cult, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Moreno: anonymity and the dark – or love, light & spirituality?

Posted by robertpriddy on May 5, 2009

Another example of Moreno’s disingenuous policy involves the picture he posted of my son (and I) on his abuse pages at , which he doggedly refused to remove, compounding his sin by making dirty attack pages against my son based on what other persons have done with whom he was associated in a band for a year or so (easily found, search for ‘Kai Nicolai Priddy’).

From Gerald Moreno's hate blogs at 'Sathya Sai Baba - Life, Love and Spirituality'

From Gerald Moreno’s hate blogs at ‘Sathya Sai Baba – Life, Love and Spirituality’

It was taken by Moreno from a Google cache of one of my former school’s website. The image was not removed by me, but by the moderator of the website in question. The photo depicted my son, who is in no way involved in the exposé and who in a civil way contacted Joe Moreno asking for its removal from his website. Moreno refused on the grounds that the image was publicly available on Google cache! Therefore steps were taken to remove the original, even though Joe’s ‘excuse’ was invalid anyhow.

Joe Moreno is not a devotee but is the main defender of all Sathya Sai matters  The major and unrepentant infringer of copyright - countless photos of critics and texts of mine - rails at length about ONE SINGLE photo which he for some reason is rather desperate to hide away.

Joe Moreno is not a devotee but is the main defender of all Sathya Sai matters The major and unrepentant infringer of copyright – countless photos of critics and texts of mine – rails at length about ONE SINGLE photo which he for some reason is rather desperate to hide away.

Gerald Moreno has lost whatever tenuous grip he might have had on facts. The implication that I – rather than him – am a “thief” after the removal of an image of my son and I, is quite stunning. Further, that it is me – and not himself – who “likes anonymity and the dark” is another of the many self-defeating blunders Moreno increasingly makes in his careless knee-jerk tit-for-tat tirades. I remind that I have posted many web pages which detail my own history and many personal details, my addresses, photos, biographical details and web pages recounting many of my experiences and interpretations. I have published several books – including ‘Source of the Dream’ which contains a photo of me inside and – in the Indian Sai Towers Publishing edition (2000) – there is a large photo of myself filling the back cover. So I can hardly be accused of “seeking anonymity and the dark”. However, it is Moreno who so wants to hide his face from the public as he once tried to hide among the hundreds of other Gerald Morenos in the United Sates. But his location, address and other details were eventually found by helpers of the exposé (see more on this here sathyasaibaba in the shadows).

Posted in copyright infringement, Cults, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Gerald Moreno rants about pictures on-line

Posted by robertpriddy on May 4, 2009

From Gerald Moreno’s web log

Gerald Moreno wants to see photos of many former ex-devotees on-line. Why? Because he wants to use more of them to promote his hate-filled blogs and web pages to promote Sathya Sai Baba and his organization through images which Google will register, thus making his pages more prominent on the image listings. His use of bold text indicates his state of mind. Gerald Moreno makes a wilful false statement about my images… he well know that I posted two images of myself together with V.K. Narasimhan on my websites at least 8 years ago. On his ‘Robert Priddy deception’ pages [long since deleted by him]  he even accused me of having illegally posted those images because they infringed the rights of Narasimhan! The images in question are my copyright.

Why does Joe Moreno complain that the image of me which appears top left of this blogsite is a “very small thumbnail-sized picture”? What’s the big deal… why does Joe want bigger ones? So he can distort them more thoroughly?

Moreno has posted another image of me found by him elsewhere on the web – and he surely is aware that several other images of my are available – I can count 6 more just offhand – some at websites I know he has carefully trawled because he has also taken materials which infringe my copyright.

After he had for years posted copyrighted photos of many ex-devotees – and has deformed their faces or bodies to smear them disgustingly – some critics eventually responded by posting his image (not deforming it). It is clear that Gerald Moreno wants not to be recognised, and one can very well understand why he feels that a liability.  Of the supposed millions of Sai devotees, the overwhelming majority would reject him and his works as entirely against their values and those preached by of Sathya Sai Baba. Any who do not must be the worst dross of the Sai movement.

Joe Moreno is not a devotee but is the main defender of all Sathya  Sai matters  The major and unrepentant infringer of copyright -  countless photos of critics and texts of mine - rails at length about  ONE SINGLE photo which he for some reason is rather desperate to hide  away.

Sathya Sai Baba – he says, but

See also

Moreno major distortion of Basava Premanand’s Declaration

Gerald Moreno and “oiling between the pubic area and the navel”
Moreno and sexual abuse, denial and subterfuge
Gerald Moreno banned from Wikipedia
The Sathya Sai Organization’s defender, Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno
Gerald Moreno plus vicious associates
Gerald Moreno and “copyright blathering”
G.J. Moreno’s ’senile dementia’ slurs, avoidances & irrationality

The Gerald Joe Moreno dossier – part 1
The Gerald Moreno dossier – part 2
Gerald Moreno firmly defends sex abusers and cover-up

Posted in copyright infringement, Guru Cult, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Gerald Moreno – Christian Fundamentalists, Anti-Semitism, Fascism

Posted by robertpriddy on May 3, 2009

The pro-Sai activist and front man on the Internet for defending Sai Baba and Co., Gerald Moreno, has tried by all kinds of false insinuation to smear former followers of Sathya Sai Baba in numerous ways – too many even to summarize effectively here. His unconcealed and massive agenda of trying to find devious ways simply to assassinate their characters, and bundle all together as liars and worse has been exposed on this blog site already.

“Second Coming” according to Moreno: He introduced the term “second coming” in a heated slanging match with Tony O’Cleary on Yahoo groups. He now tries to worm his way out of this that he uses the term “second coming” – when applied to what “Anti-Sai activists cling” –  in a wholly non-Christian sense. But the term is overwhelmingly related to fundamentalist Christian belief. This unalienable association arises firstly in any mind. Moreno relies on such methods to try to create false impressions. Such as when he greeted me “Heil Priddy” (he cannot deny he did so as it is recorded). In his latest blog on Christian fundamentalism he even uses an image of the risen Christ to increase the association of this idea to my name.

By picking out and magnifying a minor point into a long cantankerous justification intended to prove he has never ever even indirectly tried to associate me with Christian Fundamentalism. In view of all the evidence, it signally fails to pass the test of resonability.  Meanwhile, he also carefully avoids the challenge that he called Reinier van der Sandt a fundamentalist Christian, which both he and I can attaest is most certainly not true. Moreno is unable to face up to the proofs against his constant stream of base and baseless slurs against critics of the guru whose following he says he has left, but continues religiously to defend and praise.

Moreno has gone to considerable lengths to try to colour Sai Baba critics in general as Christians and/or fundamentalists of some degree:-
“For several years, many people have correctly suspected that there are Fundamentalist and Evangelical Christian movements against Sathya Sai Baba and Hinduism. Anti-Sai Activists have continually denied that Christian movements exist and have tried to dismiss these suspicions as excuse-making and the like.”[from Moreno’s web page at

How we could have “have continually denied that Christian movements exist” is preposterous in itself. Moreno makes many such sweeping generalizations and also has tried to compromise the entire range of individual he groups under the common brand “Anti-Sai Activists” in many devious ways. Such as because some Christian website has linked to critics’ pages! They were not asked to link and no one known in the exposé has had anything whatever to do with them. Moreno tries to smears by association.

Anti-Semitism slurs: Moreno has applied the same McCarthy techniques to his claim that Barry Pittard is anti-Semitic. The facts are strongly to the contrary! See Barry Pittard’s full refutation of this slur here. and also see Sai Baba Internet Man – No Apology When Caught Using

See also:-

Anti-Semitism Slur Sathya Sai Baba Man Gerald Moreno – Banned By Eight Wikpedia Editors

Sathya Sai Baba Apologist Joe Moreno’s Random Personal Attack Style (1)

Sathya Sai Baba Love, Light and Spirituality Exposed

Posted in Character assassination, Cults, Guru Cult, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba, Spiritual propaganda, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Gerald Moreno and “copyright blathering”

Posted by robertpriddy on May 1, 2009

From one of joe's countless blogs trying to cloud the fact that he - and no his critics - is a major copyright infringer

From one of Joe Moreno”s countless blogs trying to cloud the fact that he – and definitely not his critics – is a major copyright infringer.

Gerald Moreno has railed against what he childishly calls my “copyright blathering” and “whining”. He calls me and others who posted one single photo of him on-line “thieves of copyright material”. He thereby admits (no doubt unwittingly) that his major infringements of my copyright makes him a major thief of copyright! While none of us have ignored his copyright of anything else but this one photo, it is easily seen on his many sites that he has posted many copyright photos – including several of Conny Larsson, Reinier van der Sandt and myself along with extremely denigratory and/or outright hateful comments! More than that, he has manipulated the faces of some of us, and compared my image to an apish creature! Because of this, and because he has infringed my copyright on a very large scale – particularly texts and a whole website of mine, I have at last made his photo available so people can see who he is. He will be recognised during any ashram visits etc. Moreno was forced to remove some of this, but – seeing how Google and his server [] simply ignore copyright infringements proved to them under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) much still remains on-line. That Moreno’s infringements are on a very large scale is demonstrated here Copyright infringements by sathyasaibaba. In all this we see how Gerald Moreno suffers from the total lack of proportion, to an extent which marks him out as an unbalanced mentality and an angry hate-inspired person.

The above is copied from Joe's attack blog

The above is copied from Joe’s attack blog

Moreno has written a lot more hairsplitting complaints which he presents in exacerbated terms, also openly inciting people to provide him with more photos of the many critics of Sai Baba whose photos he cannot find. Why? No doubt so he can infringe their copyright and disfigure their faces or bodies etc.! This is the level of debate at which he mostly operates – a degenerate deforming ‘satire’ in the place of absent rational argumentation or cogent thoughts.

Here are some examples of Moreno’s hate campaign from some of his many paranoid blogs:-

This is one of  Joe Moreno's defenses of Sathya Sai Baba and himself

This is one of Joe Moreno’s defenses of Sathya Sai Baba and himself

The reason Gerald Moreno gives for this unintelligent piece of work is:- “Funny how those who poke fun others appearances look rather pathetic themselves. I say turnabout is fair play”

I have pointed out, however, that Sathya Sai Baba who claims his appearance will always remain youthful (just like Krishna who always was as a youth of 16 years of age), has deteriorated remarkably – and has a vacant state and a clearly aged facial  and neck features – besides being wheelchair bound due to his own fault in not following his doctors’ advice after his hip joint was shattered by a fall and operated by six doctors. This is the self-claimed Omniscient, Omnipotent Avatar, God Incarnate.

In my case, I have never made any such claims about my appearance. (Note that Moreno uses a copyright photo of me here too… the hypocrite)

Moreno only makes a fool of himself in this, as he also does in his long ago having manipulated the face of Reinier van der Sandt and the body of Sanjay Dadlani – all with the same hateful purpose, see below on left:-

Images from Gerald Moreno's blogs

Joe Moreno is not a devotee but is the main defender of all Sathya Sai matters  The major and unrepentant infringer of copyright - countless photos of critics and texts of mine - rails at length about ONE SINGLE photo which he for some reason is rather desperate to hide away.

Joe Moreno is not a devotee but is the main defender of all Sathya Sai matters The major and unrepentant infringer of copyright – countless photos of critics and texts of mine – rails at length about ONE SINGLE photo which he for some reason is rather desperate to hide away.

Posted in Cults, Guru Cult, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Gerald Moreno’s major lie about linking to exposé websites

Posted by robertpriddy on April 28, 2009

For the record only, here is one of Moreno’s earliest lies on-line about the exposé – from his first “time-line” page on

No one was ever bnned from linking to any of the named websites.

See also
Gerald Moreno’s fundamentalist Christian slur campaign
G.J. Moreno’s ‘senile dementia’ slurs, avoidances & irrationality
Gerald Joe Moreno – untruth and lies

Posted in Cults, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Propaganda, Sathya Sai Baba, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Gerald Joe Moreno – untruth and lies

Posted by robertpriddy on April 25, 2009

scan from Moreno's blog

scan from Moreno’s blog – he can’t control his language, so angry he is.

Gerald Joe Moreno constantly attacks me for lying. He has written this:-

I stand by my definition. Moreno conveniently overlooks the universal legal norm that, when an accusation of lying is made the burden of proof is on the accuser, not the accused! He is unable to prove any wilful intent on my behalf. His accusations against my lying are wilful, as all can see, and none of my errors or any other statements are proved to be wilful lies on my part. I am only guilty of some trivial inaccuracies, typos and other bagatelles. This is all being documented through my present series of blogs.

Moreno's wholly untrue slurs

Moreno’s wholly untrue slurs. Funny that blather about ‘penultimate’ too!

I do correct an incorrect statement – or an ambiguous one –  when it actually does come to my attention. In this respect, Moreno clearly always makes a false assumption that I read his e-mails – I never do since his very first two or three, nor do I open his web pages or blogs unless essential – as recently in refuting him at long last. So has previously not got much response from me. I see how he craves my attention to his trivialities and false accusation from his constant pleas to me to respond. So now he should be satisfied! Nothing I now see that he has pointed out is a lie or an untruth on my part.

As to my assertions that Joe Moreno was illegally molested in a sexual context, they are not slurs because they are entirely true: it is an objective fact that the events he described when he was “oiled” were against the law of most countries, including India [This has been pointed out by Basava Premanand, who is extremely well acquainted with Indian law].  It is not a matter of subjective feeling and/or belief, as Moreno wants it to be, and his private sense of pleasure afterwards and is entirely irrelevant. He can rail about it as much as he wants, it will not change that it was illegal. I consider that proved and closed. As to libels, Moreno has libeled me with untruths and mud-slinging constantly all over the Internet for over 4 years and now I am responding with rebuttals, to which he has responded  with more immoderate libels and inflamed language. That itself proclaims the complete lack of substance in his contrived accusations.

Moreno is unable to reply to 90% of what is shown about him and Sathya Sai Baba, so – in his emotional turmoil and  lack of integrity – he avoids it and concentrates on slurs. This will be demonstrated at length in future. Patience! Patience! Moreno doesn’t write from the heart, nor evidently much from the head either, but his spleen is evident throughout towards critics. For example, he cannot distinguish between what is “stated” and what “promotes a statement” (i.e. the case of Lisa de Witt who promoted Rebello’s statement that I was dying of AIDS… already years ago on Yahoo groups and Wikipedia talk pages). Moreno himself  promotes some of Rebello’s degenerate lies and most vulgar accusations against me too, which shows what also kind of agenda Moreno stands up for! All that is spleen, and poor ‘head work’. Explain those who can how he could have collected his web pages under the title “fair-is-fair”.

Sometimes I think Joe Moreno actually believes that I and Barry Pittard – and all the others he attacks for this – have really been lying. If so, he must suffer from have serious mental blockages and deep-seated psychic denial. It is explainable in that he has made countless claims that I and many other Sai critics are lying on innumerable points… so his entire prestige (not to mention his patently hate-aggravated mental condition) is dependent on maintaining his impossible position… and that is no doubt also why he steps up the volume of lying accusations and the extravagance of his adjectives and slurs. (See some of his countless lying accusations here)

Articles exposing Gerald Joe Moreno, alias Equalizer, SS108, JM108, GM108, visvarupa108, sheilawaring Joe Apodaco, etc. etc. and posting under the name-title ‘sathyasaibaba’ on Sathya Sai Baba Love, Light & Spirituality (wordpress blog)

Gerald Moreno’s personal details removed from

Gerald Moreno and “oiling between the pubic area and the navel”

Joe Moreno as “sathyasaibaba” with smear campaign

Joe Moreno’s schoolyard tit-for-tat attacks

‘Genital Oiling’ by Sathya Sai Baba + video evidence

Gerald Joe Moreno and genital oiling by Sai Baba

Gerald Moreno backs lying saboteur M. K. Yachendra

Joe Moreno admits he is a web impostor

More personal attacks by Gerald Joe Moreno

Sathya Sai Baba Apologist Joe Moreno’s Random Personal Attack Style (1)

Joe Moreno – massive internet abuse

Sathya Sai Baba’s front man on the Internet

Sathya Sai Baba Love, Light and Spirituality Exposed

Moreno and sexual abuse, denial and subterfuge

Sathya Sai Organisation defended by proxy

Sathyasaibaba in the shadows

Copyright infringements by sathyasaibaba

Gerald Joe Moreno (aka sathyasaibaba) dares not show his face. Why?

sathyasaibaba, Munchausen and sick fantasies

sathyasaibaba specious claims and self-defeating ‘arguments’

Cultic Labeling of Dissenters As “Disgruntled”. Sathya Sai Baba Case

Sathyasaibaba scales up hate attacks on critics

Terrorist-related Slurs Used By Sai Baba Internet Fanatic

Sai Baba Hatchet Man Picks On A Young Child

Sai Baba Internet Man – No Apology When Caught Using Anti-Semitism Slur

Sai Baba Proxy Attacker of Ex-followers and the Media

Proxy Defender of Sai Baba and SWARA

Posted in Character assassination, Cults, Guru Cult, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Propaganda, Sathya Sai Baba, Uncategorized | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Joe Moreno as “sathyasaibaba” with smear campaign

Posted by robertpriddy on April 22, 2009

Gerald Joe Moreno poses as sasthyasaibaba to mislead people

Gerald Joe Moreno poses as sasthyasaibaba to mislead people - Love & Light becoming Hate & Darkness

Having run a massive smear campaign against all critics of Sathya Sai Baba, Joe Moreno claims he is fighting a smear campaign against him! This is his tit-for-tat, back to front thinking all over. However, I and others who he has continually attacked are finally rebutting his massive years-long smear campaign against us – and he does not like it! In his psychological obsession and deep denial, he imagines he is getting his own medicine back, but this is not so. He is simply being confronted by the truth of what he has done in ill will.

joeindialieBecause Moreno lacks credible arguments and cannot confront issues properly, he has descended into childish and libelous name-calling (fascist, Christian fundamentalist, pervert, shameless liar and much more). His anonymous postings of bogus materials are legion – eg. on the Sai petition (and under the name “sheilawaring” with nothing but his own texts and links to his own materials – which had been removed along with his earlier subscription and all his postings when banned on Netscape. This remains the case, despite his virtually raving on about this minor point with a whole set of contrived and untrue statements which are too boring to repeat – see the evidence here). Backing up this here are a few more examples of his constant mendacity:
1) Moreno’s
false registration on of him being located in India, serving to deceive the webmasters into allowing his (untruthful and libelous) postings and other Indians into believing he is not located in the West – at Las Cruces, New Mexico, as he actually is.

2) That Moreno web vandalism pales beside his postings to defame Sanjay Dadlani on pornographic websites. Besides, lacking credibility, he also manipulates photos of his opponents to make them appear ugly! Among several examples, the worst so far is his anonymous blog under the pseudonym ‘Equalizer’ (which was soon exposed as being him and no other person – apropos his misleading ploy that he never denied being ‘Equalizer’ – the fact is that he would never confirm that he was Equalizer, not until exposed)… see here – Moreno’s disgusting maipulated images.

3) He defends the unspeakable Lisa de Witt – his on-line smear apprentice and co-operator

scan from Joe Moreno's blog against me

scan from Joe Moreno's blog against me

through years who he admits now mails him about once a week! He writes Robert Priddy (whose failing memory appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) cannot even remember who said what about him and falsely and erroneously attributed Leo Rebello’s comments to Lisa de Witt: What I wrote was quite different, and Joe has actually posted that, which shows that he is losing it, not I! See in the scan here that I stated Lisa de Witt “promoted” that idea (Besides I have a most excellent memory and I recall well who made the accusations – the mountebank and bogus doctor Leo Rebello – who most certainly never threatened to sue me for anything, as Joe falsely claims once again. For a start, Lisa de Witt quoted Rebello so as to smear me on a Yahoo bulletin board and on a Wikipedia talk page… Look at some few samples of Lisa de Witt’s mentality here

All this is not senility on the part of ageist Joe Moreno, it is one of many other wily, purposive misrepresentations of what I have written.

See the vast number and low nature of the attack pages on just one of Moreno’s websites

Posted in Character assassination, Cults, Guru Cult, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Joe Moreno’s schoolyard tit-for-tat attacks

Posted by robertpriddy on April 22, 2009

It is amusing that this self-styled “researcher” – Joe Moreno – has made schoolyard taunts about the current appearance of Barry Pittard, who he has never met – and whose photo he has never seen (though he did post one he presented as Pittard!). Moreno wrote “according to one email source, his face is heavily and deeply wrinkled” I can assure the public that I have photos of Pittard and he is not wrinkled in the slightest. This exemplifies one of Moreno’s methods of contriving materials, all of which appear ONLY on his contrived and self-referencing websites [he never links to anything outside his manipulatory control never to the wide range of materials that numerous opponents of Sai Baba have posted].

Sathya Sai Baba some years ago

Sathya Sai Baba some years ago. Not a pretty picture

Moreno does his usual schoolyard tit-for-tat to try to counter Pittard’s pointing out most relevantly what all can see, that Sathya Sai Baba is very noticeably aged, yet he has loudly proclaimed he would NEVER show signs of ageing! Why does Moreno not explain that massive discrepancy? Of course, Pittard has never claimed this of himself. Sathya Sai Baba has insisted that he would always retain youthful looks, putting this down to his “purity, patience and perseverance”. But he has been wheelchair bound for years now (due to a botched hip job and his egocentrically failing to follow his doctor’s orders after his operation). According to reports by a close observer who has finally left him and residence in India, Sathya Sai Baba has also shown diverse definite signs of senile development… slurred speech, weird behaviour at darsan and more. One could have sympathy even then, but NOT for his megalomaniacal and false claims!


To add insult to the ridiculous, Moreno is also an unscrupulous ageist – labeling people with whom he does not agree as suffering from “senile dementia”. Gerald Moreno’s time will also come. He is not exempted from the aging process, and can very well one day become wrinkled and decrepit after dementing himself into increasing hysteria and demeaning himself further though constant full-time muck-raking on computer screens in trying to defend the indefensible by attacking hundreds of persons on-line.

This is the self-claimed Divine Avatar, God Incarnate, Omniscient and Omnipotent, all of which claims Moreno has definitively stated he does not believe. But these are the MAIN CLAIMS Sai Baba makes on which his entire supposed Mission to Save Humanity is founded. Poor Gerald Moreno is in a total bind because he overlooks these crucial facts in defending him willy-nilly on any and every count. His denial of sexual abuses by Sathya Sai Baba will certainly never be believed by anyone but a dyed-in-the-wool devotee.

Joe Moreno continues to try to defend himself by blowing up side issues into major plots against him and degrading himself by yah-boo reactions, dirty tricks and compulsive long boring tracts vainly trying to prove minor points. Here is another example of his untruthfulness.

Anyone who is interested in the issues Moreno invents is confidently asked to view the materials on both sides before making any judgements.

Posted in Character assassination, Cults, Delusion, Guru Cult, Gurus, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Moreno dares not show his face. Why?

Posted by robertpriddy on April 2, 2009

CLICK ON THIS IMAGE TO SEE PHOTO OF MORENO – the ONE SINGLE photo which he for some reason is rather desperate to hide away.

Ever since shortly after he first appeared as a pro-Sai obfuscator (and saboteur of the International Sai petition with bogus and untruthful submissions and comments) in 2004, Gerald Joe Moreno has tried to hide his face and cover his tracks on the Internet. He posted his website via an Indian third party web service to make locating his server undiscoverable to non-technical Internet users. This was nonetheless traced to U.S. server, where libelous websites by him are still hosted.

From the start Moreno posted a photo of my son Kai and me, which is my copyright. When asked to remove it he refused point blank with absurd excuses (see and soon set about viciously attacking my son (who is totally uninvolved with any Sai criticism) in web pages trawling every possible association he could trace, though my son had no part in the things he managed to find remotely related, such as through a band in which he used to perform decades ago. Moreno uses photos of me and my son without permission despite our requests of removal. Yet he tries his utmost to get the one available image of himself removed!

Copy of joe's e-mail to K.R.D. Shepherd

Copy of Joe’s e-mail to K.R.D. Shepherd. It did not achieve the desired result.

When his photo was posted on the web by the scholar he has attacked vitriolically – Kevin Shepherd – he complained in an e-mail and said he would contact Shepherd’s server to remove it. He did not succeed. Recently, after Moreno continued his graphic attacks on me, such as by manipulating my image in cartoon fashion – a penchant of his and not the kind of thing any or defender of ‘spirituality’ or decent ‘researcher’ would ever do – which he fatuously claims to be (he is just an Internet trawler). Therefore I considered it meet to post his photo so that people – not least Sai Baba devotees – could see with whom they may be dealing. I did so on, knowing that it is possible to get wordpress to remove copyright materials (for which they have a singular honour, since Google has not complied with many proven requests). Since I received an infringement notification from that some blogs of Moreno on wordpress had been removed at my request, I fully expected Moreno to complain against me in tit-for-tat fashion as usual, and he did! Mark of mailed (18 March 2009) to warn me that the person in the image I used several times had complained and asked for its removal! So far I have not complied… Moreno claimed that he had been asked to remove the blogs in question, and that had done so himself (not admitting any wrong doing, of course), but the infringement notice made very clear he had NO OPTION. (More on this later)

Evidence of an Internet Activist in Action: Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno

Diversionary Tactics by an Internet Demagogue. The pro-Sathya Sai Baba Campaign of Gerald (‘Joe’) Moreno

Posted in Gurus, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba, Spiritual propaganda, Uncategorized | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

sathyasaibaba specious claims and self-defeating ‘arguments’

Posted by robertpriddy on April 1, 2009

Joe Moreno sees “Proxy Defenders” and “Proxy Defamers” In a show of twisted pseudo-logic, false assumptions and untrue claims, this full-time character assassinator tries to show that Barry Pittard can have no support from those we help defend concerning the sexual abuses by Sathya Sai Baba they have reported, and therefore we are “self-appointed proxy defenders” etc. That we have no support is Moreno’s baseless assumption. We have been defending the weak and defenseless subjects of the sexual abuses they have informed us about against vicious attacks on them in web pages and by a massive e-mail campaign to many of their contacts, friends and families by Moreno himself.

We actually have been asked and strongly supported in exposing these matters by a number of them and some of their families – apart for many other e-mails and comment writers on, not least the Rahm family, Conny Larsson, Ullrich Zimmermann, to name but a few.  We do not release the countless e-mails and letters, or phone calls because we have most often been asked for and have guaranteed confidentiality. This is partly because many can put themselves at risk of serious consequences (i.e. those who live in or have to visit `India). Not only have Sai students been murdered in cold blood in Sai Baba’s bedroom while he stood by, but Moreno himself has exerted himself stupendously to libel, spread gossip and contradict without any evidence more than 30 alleging victims in web pages, blogs and postings on boards, portals and defamatory comments galore to articles all over the Internet… a despicable attempt to harm people we know to be genuine and truthful after years of contact with many of them. So much for “Sathya Sai Baba Life, Love & Spirituality” and Sai Baba’s “Help ever, harm never”, “Love all, Serve all”

From Joe's blog "By Proxy Defenders..."

From Joe’s blog “By Proxy Defenders…”

See how Joe Moreno makes a great fuss about Pittard and I not having seen abuse by Sathya Sai Baba, and not having been present to any abuse. So what? Acts of which people are guilty are convicted by persons who were not witnesses, often only on forensic or circumstantial evidence. Sathya Sai Baba has been charged in the Supreme Court, but he is protected by the Government and judiciary and cannot be brought to book within India. Moreno seems to promote the almost pathological ‘solipsistic’ idea that not witnessing an event personally disqualifies one from evaluating it through the evidence and testimony, following this up through contacts and questioning and reporting about the results. Patently absurd!

Moreno slips up in saying we have NEVER (ever) been abused! We HAVE been abused – though not sexually – but by a despicable and far-reaching break of trust by Sathya Sai Baba. Many others have experienced this as abuse!  I have been wrongfully deceived on many counts – both by Sathya Sai Baba himself and his minions.  As to “psychologically unstable conspiracy theorists” Moreno supposes us to be (with no evidence because there is none, of course!)… well, that claim is surely what Moreno himself immaturely likes to characterise as “blathering” and “frothing at the mouth”.  Moreno charges Pittard and me as being “cult leaders” which is an acrobatic reversal of the truth, typical of virtually all Moreno’s more preposterous claims. It is the Sathya Sai Baba personality and religious cult that is the problem, not us! We were both once devoted workers for the Sathya Sai project, but we learned the truth about him. Joe Moreno claims he is not a follower and does not believe Sathya Sai Baba is an omniscient avatar etc. He long believed that SB is a sexual abuser… and I have indicated partly why. He is in deep psychological denial, as his thousands of web pages/blogs/comments and constant disruptive stalking activities of most Sai critics by him prove to the hilt.

Why this perpetual backward pseudo reasoning from Moreno? It is a case of total denial of a compulsive kind. Moreno has himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba lowered  and he was ‘oiled’ on his “lower stomach”. Since this was not done by a doctor under consent, it was sexual interference without explanation (‘grooming’ or testing for an erection) which objectively amounts to himself having been molested sexually (according to Indian law). Moreno did not perceive it as such, but few who go into the private room behind closed doors believing Sathya Sai Baba to be a divinity seldom do. The attention he felt this amounted to gave him a great lift, and he has stated that no one before Sai Baba had taken any notice of him! Few tell openly what happened, and Sai Baba warns most not to tell. This prominent fact in Moreno’s story is one which we may be allowed to question further, as has Basava Premanand in confronting Moreno’s defamations.  One obviously asks “how low”? Embarrassment in telling the facts accurately can fairly be assumed. Why? A well-known British author – and Oxford graduate – wrote in a popular work on Indian spirituality etc. that Sathya Sai Baba rubbed oil on his chest – but he later actually admitted to me in an e-mail that it was actually on the perineum – that is, the spot between the gonads and the anus! I have so far spared him further embarrassment by not publishing his name and providing documentation (which I do have).

Sathyasaibaba scales up hate attacks on critics

Sai Baba Proxy Attacker of Ex-followers and the Media

Terrorist-related Slurs Used By Sai Baba Internet Fanatic

Sai Baba Hatchet Man Picks On A Young Child

Proxy Defender of Sai Baba and SWARA

Serious Defamation Attempt By Gerald Moreno Defeated. – 7-person Working Committee of the JuST Group
Barry Pittard defamed

Gerald Moreno’s deceptions

Hypocritical Internet troll and flamer

Alan Kazlev on “Joe” Moreno

More Moreno lies

Alan Kazlev defends Robert Priddy

Gerald Moreno deceptions/lies
Disinformation by Joe Moreno

Moreno supports big illegal Sai cult plot

Evidence of a Internet activist
‘Joe’ Moreno – SSS108 – banned from Wikipedia

On the works of Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno’

Moreno’s internet profile and agenda

Sathya Sai Organization defender, ‘Joe’

The Unholy Trinity’

Posted in Guru Cult, Internet Abuse, Sathya Sai Baba, Supreme Court of India | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »